Architecture and Interaction Design (ArchaID) is a research group within Newcastle University's School of Architecture Planning and Landscape (based in the UK). The groups aim is to investigate, through design, the relationship between architecture and interaction design and thus between the design of places and the design of situated technologies. This blog contains articles by the group members to communicate their inspirations and thoughts.
Sunday, 29 May 2011
Post It.
Sunday, 15 May 2011
Cardboard and Ping-Pong Balls = Rainstorm
Zimoun : 138 prepared dc-motors, cotton balls, cardboard boxes 40x40x40cm, 2011 from ZIMOUN VIDEO ARCHIVE on Vimeo.
Time Architecture: Representation
For the closing event of the Presidents Medal Exhibition, William Firebrace gave an interesting presentation on the use of video and animation as a method of representation for time based architecture as opposed to static drawings. Here he showed a variety of stop motion animations that document the changing of spaces. To close the talk he presented the video of one of his students projects entitled Creative Evolution: Silvertown Ship Breaking Yard.
Creative Evolution - Silvertown Ship Breaking Yard / Reconstructed Hybrid Community from Jonathan Schofield on Vimeo.
This video uses both 3d visualisation and stop frame animation to create an impressive representation.
This talk made me think about my linked research project and the time based nature of the ‘Google building’. If the ‘Google building’ is something that is constantly shifting then an outcome of the project could be a stop frame animation to demonstrate the interaction of the space over time as opposed to static drawings. This video could then feed into the beginning of my Thesis project.
Thoughts on the Google Building
This blog post is the result of some of my thoughts regarding Google as a built form whilst researching over the weekend.
If Google was going to be a building, it would be something that is in constant flux and always changing as people interact with it. As a user starts a new search, forms (architectural) would shift to reveal new pieces of information that would be constantly refining as the user changes key words in their search to narrow down what they are looking for. The building would constantly be changing and always in flux.
Google as a building would also make information flows tangible, providing a spatial experience. It would be able to represent current happenings in the news by creating atmospheres, connecting people with events across the world, taking influence from the work by Hiroshi Ishi and his early work. On another level, the Google building could create atmospheres like that of one of my previous posts, Projection Atmospheres where the room is painted white and as you enter the room, it quickly adapts to you. Your proximity to different content on the walls then makes the room shift again so that it matches your current state. As your actions change, so does that of the building.
Alternatively, the Google building would be about indexing, making information tangible through visualisations. After a big event such as the royal wedding, different peoples search results around the globe could be visualised showing who is searching what and where. Also trends could be visualised showing what or who is the most popular both at a regional basis and a word basis. In addition, as current news stories break out, the implementation of this could be visualised by showing the sudden break out of google searches that are being made.
Ultimately, both of the above lead to the creation of tangible user interfaces.
What do I need to do to find out more?
1. Research more on the inner workings of Google. If I am going to visualise it in an architectural form then I need to understand how it works.
2. What data am I going to visualise
The Google culture has left us all now as editors. Content is left for us to decide if it is good or bad. This can be dangerous if people don’t know how to be selective. Google is an un-edited place. What does this mean to the transfer of knowledge and information?
Saturday, 14 May 2011
Mirror Mirror on the Wall…
Stealing a break from design work today I have had chance to think about my proposal. The outline of my project is how can you reflect the individual on the high street.
The weave mirror is my favourite. The picture plane is made using laminated C shapes that are printed on. The C shapes are arranged in a way that texturally mimics a homespun basket. Each C shape works effectively like a pixel which can rotate individually to reconstitute the image that appears before them. A small video camera is sited in thee middle of each mirror which is linked to a computer which controls the individual pixels.
This technology creates a fabulous image for me, of someone walking up to a shop front window advertising something then slowly the exact window that attracts them, begins to reconfigure and reflects the individual right back! The shop front that projects the desire of the masses becomes a projection of ones self.
Saturday, 7 May 2011
Discount Nothing
Wednesday, 4 May 2011
Cubelets
They seem to be a brilliant size and appear to be easy to use. Not so sure about the background music to the video though!
Cubelets Engineering Prototypes from eric schweikardt on Vimeo.
Abandoned Spaces
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Memories
Ideas Day Project Idea Two: Memories
This is the second of two project ideas that I developed during our ideas day on the 27th April 2011, the first being Google.
Concepts:
Memories - Global footprint of the world
- Global memory cloth
- Tracing
Technologies:
1. Trace and recording
2. Geo tagging
Challenges:
1. What are the memory triggers?
2. Who is it for?
3. What modes of memory?
4. Why? – Identities, remembering things you need to remember
5. What scale? a. Personal b. Global
Research Questions:
1. How do you make the virtual memory physically visible?
2. Why is the idea of leaving traces interesting? – Even though we can’t think of one.
3. How can the trace be left? - Physical version of a digital thing?
Methods:
1. Make Stuff
2. Ethnographic Study – different artefacts in memory
Google As A Built Form
Ideas Day project idea one: Google as a built form
During our ideas day on the 27th April 2011 I developed two project ideas, this being the first with the second (on a separate blog post) entitled memories. Out of both of the project ideas I feel that this is the strongest and consequently,is that topic that I am going to be focusing my research on.
Concept:
1. What would Google look like as a building?
Technologies:
1. Adaptive
2. Reconfigurable
3. Movable
4. Kinetic
5. Dynamic
6. Parametrics
Challenges:
1. Appropriate Mapping?
2. How do we do it?
3. What do we want to map in the first place?
4. How do we create an architecture in flux?
5. What data do we map?
Research Questions:
1. What is the design process for translating data structures into physical forms?
2. What constitutes a meaningful interaction between a person and a data structure at an architectural scale?
3. What do we do in the building? – Social Experience? Beacon? Research Space?
4. What is the meaningful data?
5. Who has control?
Methods:
1. Build Stuff – design as research
2. Wizard of Oz – observational
3. Prototype – Robot, Wearable Computer, Architectural computer
4. Design Studies
5. Literature – Ambient interfaces, information visualisation, philosophy of knowledge, adaptive architecture
Doing the ideas storming made me decide what I would like to get out of the linked Research project. I want to develop a strong, interesting and original project idea that I can take forward into my 6th year Design Thesis. How can I do this? One thought has been to use the linked research project to generate a topic of which I will design a small part/component as the outcome, which can then be used as the starting point of taking the investigation further in my 6th year design Thesis.